Our April 2021 cohorts are filling up quickly. Join our free webinar to Uplevel your career

Find the minimum element in an array that has been sorted and rotated by an unknown pivot.

Input: [ 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 1, 2, 3]

Output: 1

The array is sorted in the ascending order and right rotated by pivot 5. The minimum value 1 is at index 5.

Input Parameters: Function has one parameter, an integer array.

Output: Return an integer.

● 1

● -10^9

● Array elements are unique.

We provided three solutions.

We iterate over the given array and maintain the minimum value found.

O(n) where n is the number of elements in the array.

O(1).

We are not storing anything.

O(n).

Time complexity for the function find_minimum: O(log n) where n is number of elements in array.

Time complexity for the complete program: O(n) where n is number of elements in array, because size of input is n.

In this approach we used recursive binary search. If we take some examples and look closely, we would observe some patterns:

If array was previously sorted in ascending order:

• The minimum element is the only element whose previous element is greater than it.

• If we found any subarray ( from low to high ) which is ascending sorted then minimum element will be element at low.

• Else minimum element lies in either left half or right half.

• If middle element is greater than element at low, then the minimum element lies in right half.

• Else minimum element lies in left half.

If array was previously sorted in descending order:

We use these patterns to make solution:

• The minimum element is the only element whose next element is greater than it.

• If we found any subarray ( from low to high ) which is descending sorted then minimum element will be element at high.

• Else minimum element lies in either left half or right half.

• If middle element is less than element at low, then the minimum element lies in right half.

• Else minimum element lies in left half.

As the time complexity of binary search will be

T(n) = T(n/2) + c ( Each iteration reducing array in half ).

The above function can be solved either using recurrence Tree method or Master method. It falls in case II of Master Method and solution of the function is O(log n) hence, complexity of our solution (find_minimum function) is O(log n).

O(log n) where n is number of elements in array.

Similarly by above logic for time complexity, number of recursive calls will be O(log n) and hence size of function stack used will be O(log n).

O(n) where n is number of elements in array.

Input is O(n) because we are storing n elements of array and auxiliary space used is O(1). So, O(n) + O(1) -> O(n).

Time complexity for the function find_minimum: O(log n) where n is number of elements in array.

Time complexity for the complete program: O(n) where n is number of elements in array, because size of input is n.

Here we are using an iterative approach of binary search. Explanation will be the same as mentioned above for suboptimal_solution.

O(1).

As we are using only constant extra space.

O(n) where n is number of elements in array.

Input is O(n) because we are storing n elements of array and auxiliary space used is O(1). So, O(n) + O(1) -> O(n).