Our April 2021 cohorts are filling up quickly. Join our free webinar to Uplevel your career

Calculate Hamming weight of an array of integers.

Hamming weight of an integer is defined as the number of set bits in its binary representation. Hamming weight of an array is a sum of hamming weights of all numbers in it.

**Example**

Input:[1, 2, 3]

Output: 4

Binary representation of 1 is “1”; one set bit.

Binary representation of 2 is “10”; one set bit.

Binary representation of 3 is “11”; two set bits.

1 + 1 + 2 = 4

**Notes**

Input Parameters: Function has one parameter: array of 64-bit integers.

Output: The function returns an integer.****

**Constraints:**

● 1

● 0

We provided two solutions.

Per the constraints, all the elements in the array can be stored in a 32-bit integer and hence, to calculate the number of set bits in an integer x, we can iterate on all these 32 bits of the corresponding integer and keep a count of the number of set bits.

We repeat the same process for all integers in the given input array s and keep the count of total set bits in all integers. To optimize the solution we can break traversal over the bits once we encounter the MSB(Most Significant Bit / Leftmost set bit) in the integer x.

O(n) where n is the number of elements in the given input array.

For every integer in the array, we iterate over its 32 bits (constant number of repetitions).

**Auxiliary Space Used:**

O(1).

We don’t store any data.****

**Space Complexity:**

O(n).

Our main aim of the solution is to calculate the hamming distance of an integer x in constant time with some precomputation.

As the integer size is 32 bit as per the input constraints. So, we can divide the 32-bit integer x, into two 16-bits integers.

[31th , 30th , ……. , 17th, 16th] [ 15th , 14th, ………. , 1th , 0th]

A B

Let’s call the first part i.e. from [31th bit to 16th bit] as A and second part from [15th bit to 0th] bit as B. Also, note that both these integers A and B are 16-bit integers. Now, the total set bits in the integer x is equal to number of set bits in integer A + number of set bits in integer B and this is the key idea for this solution. Now let Sz be the number of all possible 16-bit integers. So, we precompute the number of set bits for all Sz integers and store it in memory. We can compute the set bits for all Sz integers in linear time. Let’s say dp[i] denotes the number of set bits in integer i. So, we can compute dp[i] using the below state relation :

dp[i] = dp[i >> 1] + (i&1)

In the above relation (i&1) tells if the 0th bit is set in the binary representation of the integer i. To illustrate the above relation, consider the calculation of dp[5].

Now, (5)base10 = (101)base2

So, dp[5] = dp[5 >> 1] + 5&1

Here 5&1 is 1 as the 0th bit is set in binary representation of 5.

As now, we have taken 0th bit of 5 under consideration and hence, now we can right shift the binary representation of 5 by 1 to omit the 0th bit and then calculate the number of set bits in the resulting integer. Also, as right shifting 5 by 1 will result in an integer which is less than 5 and as we are iteratively computing dp states the resultant state dp[5>>1] would have already been computed. Hence, dp[5] = dp[2] + 1 i.e. last bit in 5 plus the number of set bits in 2.

Once, we have precomputed set bits individually for all 16-bit integers. We can answer calculate the number of set bits in a 32-bit integer by two lookups in the precomputed state values.

So, for an integer x we first divide it into A and B as explained above and then we do a lookup in our dp[A] and dp[B] to get the set bits in the integer x. We repeat the same process for all integers in the array s and keep count of the total number of set bits and hence, the hamming weight of the array.

Also, instead of dividing the array into 2 parts, we can divide it into 4 integers each of size 8 bits and proceed the same way as we did in the above explanation. This will reduce the space complexity significantly, but will require 4 lookups and hence will double the previous time complexity. Though, the asymptotics remain the same.

Bonus take away – this is called as the Space-Time trade off.

Kindly, refer to the solution for implementation details.

**Time Complexity:**

O(n + Sz) where n is number of elements in the given array s and Sz be the number of all possible 16-bit integers i.e. 2^16.

Precomputing dp state for all 16 bit integers take a linear time O(2^16) as explained above. To calculate the set bits in an integer x we are performing 2 iterations. Hence, for all n integers the time complexity become O(2*n). Summing up the overall time complexity becomes O( 2*n + Sz ) → O(n + Sz).

**Auxiliary Space Used:**

O(Sz) where Sz be the number of all possible 16-bit integers i.e. 2^16.

As, we are pre-computing set bits for all 16 bit integers and storing it. Hence the space complexity is O(Sz).****

**Space Complexity:**

O(n + Sz) where n is number of elements in the given array s and Sz be the number of all possible 16-bit integers i.e. 2^16.For storing input, it will take O(n) and as auxiliary space used is O(Sz) hence total complexity will be O(n) + O(Sz) → O(n + Sz).